Lite n' Easy
Marketing lead: Not recorded · Total appointments: 1
Roster: Ogilvy (creative) SMALL ROSTER
Loyalty indexNot enough data1 record, needs 3
Avg tenureNot enough data1 record, needs 3
CMO effectNot enough data1 record, needs 3
Next reviewNot enough data0 records, needs 3
Account barcode Solid cells: agency of record at year end. Hatched rows: seen in campaign credits, not an appointment
creative
242526
OgilvyNone recorded
Agency roster by discipline Tenure in years
| Discipline | Agency | From | To | Tenure | Retained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| creative | OgilvyCURRENT | 6 July 2026 | Now | 0.3 | 0 |
Pitch predictor How it works
Not enough history to predict (0 records, needs 3 including at least two completed agency relationships).
Full history Every pitch, review, win and retention
| Announced | Decided | Type | Discipline | Incumbent | Winner | Also pitched | Est. $m | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 July 2026 | 6 July 2026 | appointment | creative | Thinkerbell | Ogilvy | confirmed | via Campaign Briefvia B&Tvia Mediaweek |
Marketing leaders
No marketing leaders recorded yet.
On the record Short paraphrases with links
WHY THEY WON Hayman pointed to a collaborative way of working, an integrated, joined-up offering and a clear grasp of the customer and category as the reasons for choosing Ogilvy. Nathan Hayman · the move · via Campaign Brief, 6 July 2026 · paraphrased